Steve Chessin wrote:
>If you have "another, more dense, machine readable area that would
>represent the entire ballot", but the voter doesn't verify it, or have
>a way to verify it, you're back to square one. You don't know that
>the paper record corresponds to the machine image. And asking the voter
>to verify not just who they voted for, but also the names they saw that
>they could have voted for, is probably asking too much.
>
>
Bingo. Very good point. I agree 100%. Thank you.
-- Bob
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Apr 30 23:17:05 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:17:29 CDT