Thanks, Steve--haven't heard from you in a while
I think it is essential to reason about the whole process of voting. Making
the software for the voting machine is important, but, imo, there's a lot
more we have to think about assuming we're interested in transitioning to
the best voting system possible (where "voting system" does not equal
"voting machine").
Alan D.
> I think that this is totally off-topic. I thought you were going to
> build a voting machine that would be able to comply with the election
> laws of each of the 50 states (plus DC and the territories), and lobby
> to change any laws that would prevent certification of such a machine.
> And I thought that the purpose of this list was to help facilitate that
> goal. I don't see how a discussion such as the above advances the
> cause; it seems a diversion of energy from this list's purpose.
>
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Tue Aug 31 23:17:06 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 31 2004 - 23:17:22 CDT