Charlie wrote:
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1826549866685179676&hl=en
> ....
> Also I thought the "rush" to market aspect of it was another
> plus for OVC's use of commodity hardware and multiple
> vendor business model. This should be much less subject
> to source failures and have an adversarial competitive
> nature that might lend some quality control.
>
I agree. It's bad, but that's good ... as if we need more evidence,
ammunition, etc.
Every time I think we have everything we need, it seems we don't. Then we
get more. Of course, I thought we had enough in 2000.
I'm tired of saying we're getting close. So I won't say that.
Alan D.
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Aug 31 23:17:05 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 31 2007 - 23:17:07 CDT