Does anyone know if there are tests and reports on the Diebold AccuVote
optical scanner firmware version 1.94w?
Diebold is making claims that the 1.96 tests conducted in California don't
apply because "it is completely different". But both use the same
architecture: memory cards, etc. So I would expect the same vulnerabilities,
such as viral hacking via the memory cards, would be applicable.
Anybody have any technical information or otherwise to help me refute the NH
Diebold vendor claims?
Thanks.
Nancy
-- Nancy Tobi Chair, Fair Elections Committee Legislative Coordinator, Election Defense Alliance nancy.tobi@gmail.com www.DemocracyForNewHampshire.com www.electiondefensealliance.org 603.315.4500
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Aug 31 23:17:05 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 31 2007 - 23:17:07 CDT