[OVC-discuss] Fw: Computerworld article on OVC at LinuxWorld

From: Alan Dechert <dechert_at_gmail_dot_com>
Date: Wed Aug 06 2008 - 21:12:58 CDT

LinuxWorld has been a great success for OVC! One more day ...

Here's an article from today:


----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Dechert
To: Brent Turner
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:43 PM
Subject: Computerworld article on OVC at LinuxWorld

Open-source e-voting gets LinuxWorld test run
The system runs on Ubuntu Linux
August 6, 2008 (Computerworld) SAN FRANCISCO -- Computer engineer Alan Dechert didn't like what he saw during the controversial vote tallying in Florida in 2000's presidential election.

That was when he decided that there had to be a better way for U.S. citizens to safely and accurately cast their ballots.

More than seven years later, Dechert is here at the LinuxWorld Conference & Expo, publicly displaying the open-source e-voting system he helped develop that fixes some of the problems that he and other critics found in the nation's voting systems almost a decade ago.

"I watched the 2000 election, and I was stunned that we didn't know how to count ballots," Dechert said.

In Florida, where paper punch-card ballots were used at the time in many counties, the nation watched in disbelief for weeks as the presidential election came down to the wire over punch cards that were analyzed individually and manually by voting officials. At issue was voter intent, as officials tried to decipher who voters had selected on the ballots, which often weren't fully punched out by the machines that were supposed to mark the ballots.

It took analysis of those ballots and a U.S. Supreme Court decision to finally decide the winner of that election, almost a month after the last polling place closed.

That December, Dechert co-founded the Granite Bay, Calif.-based Open Voting Consortium to try to help come up with a better way to vote in this country.

"This was conceived as a pilot project for Sacramento County [Calif.] in December 2000," he said. The idea was to create an electronic voting system that allows voters to make their candidate selections on a screen, then clearly print their ballots and have them scanned and tallied by reliable machines.

By creating such a system, Dechert said, then "there's no ambiguity about what the voter intended," fixing one of the most glaring problems of the old punch-card systems and poorly designed ballot layouts.

The system, which was set here at LinuxWorld for show attendees to view and vote in mock elections, runs on PCs loaded with Ubuntu Linux and the free, open source e-voting application created by the consortium.

For election officials, the system is a simple one that would allow voters to be sure of their choices before they leave the ballot-casting area, Dechert said. Officials could set up and create the ballot in any elections intuitively with a special software tool that would add candidate names, office titles and other relevant information without requiring major computing skills.

The application runs on standard PC architecture and requires no specialized equipment.

"They don't have to do anything special," Dechert said of local election officials who would use the system. "They don't have to know anything special."

LinuxWorld attendee Greg Simonoff tests out the Open Voting Consortium's proposed e-voting system. Photo by Todd Weiss.

By going to an open-source system, he said, the application's code could be carefully and publicly analyzed for flaws and security issues, then could be fixed and made trustworthy for use. At least, that's the position of open-source advocates who think they can build a better system than those created by proprietary vendors across the nation.

"What we're trying to advance is full public scrutiny, with many eyes on the code," Dechert said.

The open-source system aims to address several concerns about traditional vendor-supplied e-voting systems in use across the U.S., he said, including the following:

  a.. By being open source, the code can be checked at any time for flaws or problems by any qualified programmer or developer, making it more transparent and trustworthy.
  b.. By using off-the-shelf PC hardware and printers and other peripherals, it's much cheaper than custom, purpose-built e-voting consoles and equipment.
  c.. It's usable by handicapped voters and by voters who speak languages other than English.
  d.. It contains a voter-verifiable and fully auditable paper record that can be preserved and is recountable.
"It could be used now," Dechert said. Some local voting jurisdictions are in talks with the group now about looking further at the system, including local officials in at least one Maryland county, he said.

For use in national elections, the system would have to be heavily analyzed and eventually certified as an election system, Dechert said. That process is part of the group's future goals, he said.

Here in San Francisco, for the system in display on the show floor, mock voters entered a booth and stood in front of a computer screen that lay flat in front of them on a table. The voters then used a traditional computer mouse to make their selections on the one-screen ballot and then advanced the ballot selections with on-screen arrows. Voters could also choose to go back to check or change their selections.

After completing the ballots, participants were asked to confirm their candidate or referendum-question selections several times, then were able to print their ballots on a printer also in the voting cubicle. Each voter then put the printed paper ballot in a manila folder and walked it over to a nearby election official, who electronically tallied and scanned it in front of the voter.

More than 300 people tried out the system yesterday. Project organizers set up a ballot with the three major party candidates in this year's presidential election, as well as several referendum questions about e-voting and other topical public issues.

Dick Turnquist, an IT manager at the Association of California Water Agencies in Sacramento, test-voted on the proposed system and said he liked what he experienced. "It certainly was easy enough to use. I probably would prefer it" to existing e-voting systems, Turnquist said.

Greg Simonoff, an engineer at the California Department of Transportation, said he liked using the system but would prefer a touch-screen voting mechanism rather than a mouse-based system.

Dechert said the mouse-based system is being used in the demonstration phase of the project to cut costs but would be replaced with a touch-screen system in production.

OVC-discuss mailing list
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/

= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain

Received on Sun Aug 31 23:17:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 31 2008 - 23:17:18 CDT