On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Rick Carback <carback1@umbc.edu> wrote:
> I'd say 0-9 or 0-10 is probably the best range, because it is what
> most people are familiar with. Others say range should be # of
> candidates, so that people have the ability to rank if they so choose.
> CRV really hasn't asked or answered the question of what range is the
> best range. I'm not sure anyone over there cares.
>
http://rangevoting.org/Why99.html
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sun Aug 31 23:17:04 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 31 2008 - 23:17:18 CDT