Alan,
Just saw your note :
>
> Perhaps we could describe in our resolution the standard --
including some
> of its properties (e.g., XML-based, compatible licensing, etc.) --
we want
> to adopt.
>
> If so, can we get help with a list of those properties?
>
> Alan D.
>
I believe we can distill this list easily - and then of course any
standards matching those criteria would be preferred.
The EML white paper that just was published - certainly lots of bullet
points in there that are candidate items - i can work with John Borras (TC Chair) and Joe Hall (TC member) on getting that set together during the coming week - and then we'll send something over for OVC consideration.
Thanks, DW
"The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472 B.C.)
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Wed Feb 28 23:17:06 2007