On 1/26/06, Ron Crane <voting@lastland.net> wrote:
> You must be referring to the 5th Amendment's prohibition on compelled
> self-incrimination. I'd love to hear vendors argue that one.
nope... you'll have to wait a bit to hear more. I apologize. -Joe
> I'm interested in your reasoning. Why shouldn't the public be able to
> review the software that handles its votes? Why should vendors -- who, after
> all, are really fiduciaries of the public trust of handing our votes -- be
> able to hide what they're doing? Why should the public be forced to trust
> the "experts"?
I personally think that the public should be able to review the
software. more later, Joe
-- Joseph Lorenzo Hall <http://josephhall.org/> _______________________________________________ OVC-discuss mailing list OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss ================================================================== = The content of this message, with the exception of any external = quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain ==================================================================Received on Mon Jan 8 20:24:34 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 08 2007 - 20:24:39 CST