Arthur,
> I agree we should not stay on the side lines. We should also not
> have changes to the standards (or even worse, the standards process)
> be on the critical path of getting our system adopted.
>
To a certain extent, we have no choice in the matter. For the most part
recommendations, standards etc. just don't cover the OVC system. We have to
get involved in this aspect.
> Of course, we should propose changes to the standards and the
> standards process. But we will never "own" the process, and we have
> to pass the current processes to join the club first.
>
We may never "own" the process. But to be successful, we will have to get
seriously involved in the process. Otherwise, the likes of ES&S, Diebold,
Sequoia, and Hart Intercivic will use their own influence with standards
bodies to keep us out.
Alan D.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Mon May 31 23:17:05 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 31 2004 - 23:18:15 CDT