I think that a good way to conduct an election that most people would
consider trustworthy would have these characteristics:
1. Voter marked paper ballot for most voters.
2. Ballot marking or printing device for voters with disabilities.
3. Precinct scanner to check for over/under vote.
4. Hand count for some precincts as verification.
5. Open source software running on off-the-shelf systems.
Some things about which there is a variation of opinions:
6. Electronic records of data from scanned precinct ballots is sent
for central tabulation, keeping paper ballots as a cross-check.
The alternative is to scan the ballots at a central scanner and use
that count, keeping the precinct electronic records as cross-check.
7. Some prefer hand count in precincts for elections without instant
runoff voting.
8. Hand counting for entire elections without instant runoff voting.
Does this express the consensus of this group?
-Danny
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
By sending email to the OVC-discuss list, you thereby agree to release the content of your posts to the Public Domain--with the exception of copyrighted material quoted according to fair use, including publicly archiving at http://gnosis.python-hosting.com/voting-project/
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Fri Nov 30 23:17:25 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 23:17:31 CST