Re: [OVC-demo-team] VoteHere has released their source - sort of

Something Fred forgot to mention is that /. also included a small reference
*back to us* (as in, VoteHere's move was good, but OVC over here is doing it
right) in the article summary. Take a look:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/07/1453224&mode=thread&tid=103&tid=99

I suspect they did this in response to our recent activity. Would it be a good
idea to put out a press release re-iterating our approach and how it differs?
VoteHere seems to be only pulling a PR stunt. A comment on /. sums it up
well:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=103224&threshold=-1&commentsort=1&tid=103&mode=thread&cid=8794552

Keep the media exposure coming!

Eron

On Wednesday 07 April 2004 7:21 pm, Fred McLain wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> New Scientist is running a piece (also in SlashDot) about VoteHere
> releasing their sources today.
>
> A caution for all devs on this list, do not download their source.
> embedded in the license for the source is:
>
> "VoteHere shall own title to and ownership of any derivative works of
> the Software".
>
> We don't want ownership of the OVC software to come into question so
> it's probably best we don't even look at their stuff.
>
> -Fred-
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external 
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain    
==================================================================