> Something Fred forgot to mention is that /. also included a small
reference
> *back to us* (as in, VoteHere's move was good, but OVC over here is doing
it
> right) in the article summary. Take a look:
>
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/07/1453224&mode=thread&tid=103&tid=99
>
Excellent!
> I suspect they did this in response to our recent activity. Would it be a
good
> idea to put out a press release re-iterating our approach and how it
differs?
> VoteHere seems to be only pulling a PR stunt. A comment on /. sums it up
> well:
>
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=103224&threshold=-1&commentsort=1&tid=103&mode=thread&cid=8794552
>
I think VoteHere can be dismissed. They have demonstrated only one thing:
How to burn through millions of dollars and produce absolutely nothing of
value.
Alan D.
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sat Nov 22 03:47:09 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Nov 22 2008 - 03:47:30 CST