Why not add a paper audit trail requirement, if not on all aspects, perhaps at least on initial voter registration applications? That would help in detecting fradulent voter registrations.
-- Kurt This email sent using 100% recycled electrons. -------------- Original message from Arthur Keller <arthur@kellers.org>: -------------- > From: "Barbara Simons" > To: "Quixote Group" > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 5:48 PM > Subject: the USACM study of Voter Registration Databases > > > Dear colleagues, > > This email is in response to my request for help in publicizing the ACM > study of computerized databases of registered voters. > > You can find the Executive Summary, list of panelists, and full report > (a downloadable pdf file) at http://www.acm.org/usacm/VRD/. The report > is aimed at the general public and at election officials. However, for > those folks who don't want to read the full report, we have a separate > file called Overview and Recommendations that can be downloaded. It > contains our 99 recommendations. > > I blush to admit that we didn't think of some of the problems that have > occurred. For example, while we discuss well known problems with > inaccuracies in registrar of voters databases and recommend against > using database matches to purge voters, it never occurred to us that > someone would do something so foolish as to disenfranchise voters whose > names are not an exact match with the names in some other databases. > > When we discussed the need for backups to the electronic poll > books, the problem of having the poll books crash in the middle of an > election with the accompanying difficulty of determining who had > already voted did not occur to us. > > Still, if election officials were to follow our recommendations, the > situation would be greatly improved. I suspect that there is not a > single jurisdiction that has followed even a majority of our > recommendations. I believe that the Maryland meltdown was just a > prelude to what is coming in November. > > I've included below the press release that ACM issued when our study > was released. > > Regards, > Barbara > > P.S. I also recommend the study that Kim [Kim Alexander of > California Voter Foundation] did on privacy issues > relating to voter registration. It's a real eye opener. > > ACM STUDY GROUP ISSUES VOTER REGISTRATION GUIDELINES TO ASSURE PRIVACY > AND ACCURACY > > Washington, DC, February 16 , 2006 - A team of computer security and > voting experts has issued recommendations to ensure that electronic > records of information submitted by citizens registering to vote are > accurate, private and secure. In a report commissioned by the > Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), state and local election > officials now have nearly 100 high-level guidelines designed to help > states comply with Federal laws that require computerized statewide > electronic databases to be operational by 2006. > > "If these guidelines are not implemented, at a minimum there could be > widespread confusion and Election Day failures. And in the worst case, > voters across the nation could be disenfranchised and election fraud > could result," said Paula Hawthorne, co-chair of the Voter Registration > Database Study Committee. Hawthorne, a former database expert at > Hewlett-Packard, and vice president of software development for several > start-up companies, identified a series of risks, including hacker > attacks, massive Election Day failures, severe privacy violations, and > further erosion of confidence in the election process. > > "These guidelines will enable the more than 20 states that have not yet > met these federal deadlines to avoid Election Day problems," said Study > Committee co-chair Barbara Simons, a past president ACM, who is retired > from IBM Research. "They also provide a useful template for those > states which have complied with federal deadlines, but may need to > revamp their processes and procedures in light of the report's > recommendations," she said. > > The report outlines "best practices" from technology experts recruited > for their special knowledge and understanding of these areas. It > presents guidelines to make certain that voter databases are > consistently reliable and accessible by people with diverse > backgrounds, purposes, and knowledge. > > The study was commissioned to develop objective technical information > and expert recommendations to help states and localities comply with > provisions of the Help America Vote Act, which was passed in the wake > of voting problems in the 2000 Presidential Election. > The guidelines will enable state and local officials to address > potential risks by: > a) adopting transparent policies and open practices for managing > technical and logistical aspects of voter registration databases. > b) setting clear accountabilities for those responsible for proposing, > making, or approving changes to the data, the system, or its policies. > c) establishing audit trails to track changes made to data, security > policy, and database design. > d) designing privacy policies that are fundamental to the system, and > based on long-established and widely-accepted Fair Information > Practices procedures. > > The complete Electronic Voter Registration Database Study and a list of > report's authors are available online at http://www.acm.org/usacm/VRD/. > > > About ACM > > ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery http://www.acm.org, is an > educational and scientific society uniting the world's computing > educators, researchers and professionals to inspire dialogue, share > resources and address the field's challenges. ACM strengthens the > profession's collective voice through strong leadership, promotion of > the highest standards, and recognition of technical excellence. ACM > supports the professional growth of its members by providing > opportunities for life-long learning, career development, and > professional networking. > > > # # # > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., 3881 Corina Way, Palo Alto, CA 94303-4507 > tel +1(650)424-0202, fax +1(650)424-0424 > _______________________________________________ > OVC-discuss mailing list > OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net > http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
_______________________________________________
OVC-discuss mailing list
OVC-discuss@listman.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/ovc-discuss
==================================================================
= The content of this message, with the exception of any external
= quotations under fair use, are released to the Public Domain
==================================================================
Received on Sat Sep 30 23:17:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 30 2006 - 23:17:08 CDT